A long while back, I started learning how to program and create stand-alone applications. I really didn't wind up creating anything much, really. I had several projects I was working on in my learning such as "Hyponiq's Calculator", a customizable and fully-functional calculator with command logging and other nifty little features. None of those projects were ever really completed as I lost interest or moved onto other things. I also pretty much concentrated (and still do) mostly on Web development and all things related.
Well, recently I downloaded and installed Microsoft's Visual Studio 2008 Express Edition on both of my PCs -- my desktop and laptop. I decided that if I were going to have it, I need to use it. I've always had Visual Studio since it's 2003 release, but it really just collects dust as I hardly ever create ASP .NET applications anymore. Mostly, I utilize PHP as my server-side application interpreter. PHP is really so much better than ASP .NET, although ASP .NET does have its benefits such as the direct link to the Windows APIs and the .NET Framework. Both are strong and powerful and I hold no ill will towards Microsoft and their technologies. In point of fact, almost all of Microsoft's applications are my preferred tools and resources, with just a few exceptions ... such as the Expression tools line (yuck!).
Whatever the case, Visual Studio did nothing more for me anymore than simply sit on my hard drive looking pretty. Version 2008, however, does have major key benefits and improvements over the 2005 release and previous versions, as well. So, again I decided it was high time I started using my programming skills and put them to good use. The problem: finding the right thing to produce. With so many programmers, developers, and architects in the industry, it's really difficult to find that inspiration as almost all ideas are covered ... except for at least one.
So what's the issue? I use, primarily, Microsoft Internet Information Services 7 (IIS7) as my default Web service provider for my project(s) testing suite. I have no problems with IIS7. In point of fact, I love it! It is so very easy to install, use, and configure. Plus, it has a very low profile on my processor(s). Unfortunately, it only comes in Windows Vista and/or Windows Server 2008 or higher. My laptop has Windows Vista Home Premium which allows me to install IIS7 and run it as an advanced service platform. It is multi-threaded and allows me to utilize PHP to its max potential. The point of interest here is that PHP can utilize per-directory configuration settings as well as a master configuration settings file for default configurations. There are many other points here, as well, but the aforementioned is my number one concern. My desktop, on the other hand, runs Windows XP Media Center Edition (which is really Windows XP Professional with a few media-related tweaks and its own indigenous GUI theme). And, yes, my desktop PC is a little outdated. I have the ability to run IIS 5.1, but it is not a multi-threaded server and therefore does not allow for virtual hosts. It only allows for one Web site; not many. There-in lies the issue. I simply must have a multi-threaded environment. I could (and should) just buy Windows Vista, but it is very expensive and I'd rather spend my money on something else, really. That's not to say that Vista is bad; it's not and I do prefer it over XP. The simple fact remains that this PC (my desktop) isn't quite suitable for Vista, although it can handle it (and I have tested it). Sometime in the not-so-distant future, I'll be purchasing an MSDN subscription which will allow me to download all Microsoft Windows platforms, but that doesn't solve the problem now.
So, Apache HTTPD (Apache, for short), therefore, is the solution. It is highly configurable via the configuration files (i.e. http.conf, vhosts.conf, et cetera) and allows for a plethora of application extensions, code libraries, scripting engines, and so on. In other words, I can use PHP and have multiple Web sites! There are three problems I have with Apache, however.
Issue #1: Apache, on a Linux/Unix platform, has a stand-alone, visual configuration tool for manipulating the configuration files. Using this tool is easy and fairly light-weight on the processor and memory. Although it's a great tool, the open-source Apache Configuration Tool (which ships with most Linux/Unix ports) is a Linux/Unix only tool and I haven't found any successful and powerful-enough ports to the Win32 architecture. In other words, I haven't found any useful Apache configuration tools available for Windows. There are a few projects out there (Google returned 295,000 hits for "apache configuration tool") that I found, but not one of them does exactly what I would like. Plus, being as pedantic and OCD as I am, many of the said applications are ugly, over-bloated, and resource intense. Also, a lot of them are not free of charge which, to me, defeats the entire purpose of open-source software. So, returning back to the original topic -- programming -- I'm taking it upon myself to create a new visual tool for Apache, building upon IIS7's visual interface. What that means is that I'm basically going to emulate Microsoft's IIS7's configuration tool. Almost all the features found therein will be available in my Apache configuration tool. I haven't decided a name for it, but that'll come in time. Moreover, this project will be open-source and freely distributable. I believe in open-source technology, which is my only real gripe to Microsoft. Personally, I believe Microsoft should release a freely distributable version of the Windows platform, if only limited in abilities, along side of other technologies -- namely: IIS. Sure, they have their operating systems freely downloadable to MSDN and TechNet subscribers, but that's really not the same as those subscriptions cost more than the operating systems supplied. Imagine that. . o O ( Damn, I'm rambling! )
So, anyway, I'm definitely going to start that project immediately.
Issue #2: Using PHP on Apache isn't as successful as using it on IIS7. The foremost complaint I have is the simple fact that PHP's per-directory configuration settings don't work quite the same on Apache as it does on IIS7 (one of the many reasons for why I don't understand why everyone is so uptight about using Apache over IIS7). You can read more information in this blog post. So, what am I going to do about that? I'm going to write an Apache module that allows PHP to find and use separate configuration files per-directory as well as read the standard configuration settings from the master file. I haven't yet figured it out in my head how to go about this, but I'm sure I will.
Issue #3: Going back to the beginning parts of this discussion, I mentioned the fact that I utilize ASP .NET in some of my yester-year projects. As I said before, ASP .NET is a powerful and very-useful application platform. I have no problems with it (minus the major difference in overall development time vs. PHP). I'm sure sometime in the future that I'll be using ASP .NET for someone's site architecture and will/would definitely need the ability to run ASP .NET from my computer(s). Once again, my laptop can do this as it has IIS7; my desktop cannot, however, due to the operating system. So, the solution is to build an Apache extension that taps into the very powerful .NET framework and serve ASP .NET pages. There is/was an Apache module project already started (and probably many more) -- mod_aspdotnet. There is also a cross-platform (Windows included) .NET Framework port called Mono (as well as the corresponding Apache module (mod_mono)) which allows for .NET Framework development using some of the more common programming languages (including my favorite language (for programming, that is): C#). Bearing that in mind, Mono is still under development and will probably continue to be so as it seems to be a fairly popular project. mod_aspdotnet, however, isn't maintained properly (the last build date was in 2006!). Temporarily, until I release my first stable version of my own Apache module, I'll be using mod_aspdotnet. The concept here is to allow Apache to interpret and serve ASP .NET-related pages (particularly ASPX) and work from the System.Web sub-classes of said framework. This will probably be the most complicated of the three Apache projects I have in mind with it being the latter project tackled.
So, all in all it seems I have my work cut-out for me. It'll probably be several months before the first official release of any of the above projects, but it will keep me company and occupied so I'm not doing other, potentially harmful things (but that's another discussion).
Monday, February 9, 2009
Sunday, February 8, 2009
Apache & PHP: Multiple PHP.ini Configuration Files
I just thought I'd add my little tid-bits of information here as I searched and searched for possible solutions to a formidable problem: How can I use per-directory PHP configuration settings in Apache?
I read through several different work-arounds and tested them thoroughly. I've come to one possible and viable solution.
Solution #1: The information listed here in this documentation section seemed to be the best possible solution. The php_value, php_flag, php_admin_value, and php_admin_flag (settings available in httpd.conf, vhosts.conf, or per-directory .htaccess files) seemed to do the job nicely in each and all of my virtual hosts. It takes a LOT of editing -- and possibly a lot of files -- but the results are efficient and less CPU taxing.
So, if you wanted to set a virtual host's doc_root directive, you'd use something like:
I read through several different work-arounds and tested them thoroughly. I've come to one possible and viable solution.
Solution #1: The information listed here in this documentation section seemed to be the best possible solution. The php_value, php_flag, php_admin_value, and php_admin_flag (settings available in httpd.conf, vhosts.conf, or per-directory .htaccess files) seemed to do the job nicely in each and all of my virtual hosts. It takes a LOT of editing -- and possibly a lot of files -- but the results are efficient and less CPU taxing.
So, if you wanted to set a virtual host's doc_root directive, you'd use something like:
# vhosts.conf
NameVirtualHost *:81
<VirtualHost *:81>
ServerAdmin admin@example.com
ServerName vhost.example.com
DocumentRoot "C:/path/to/doc/root"
ErrorLog "logs/vhost.example.com-errors.log"
# Set the PHP "doc_root" directive
php_value doc_root "C:/path/to/doc/root"
<Directory "C:/path/to/doc/root">
# ... yadda, yadda, yadda ...
# you get the point!
</Directory>
</VirtualHost>
I used the doc_root directive example due to the fact that if you want to use relative paths to include files (i.e. <?php require_once "Classes/MyClass.php"; ?>) in files several folders deep in the tree, you need to tell PHP where to look. By default, if this is not set, or if the include_path directive is not set, PHP only looks in it's own directory (i.e. C:/PHP). However, setting the master PHP configuration file's include_path directive to all the virtual hosts' directories can cause problems, especially if you're including files with the same name in several different virtual hosts (as is in my case where I use my own framework for each of my Web site projects). It also taxes PHP as far as efficiency is concerned. It is for this I started using per-directory PHP.ini configuration files in all of my virtual hosts under IIS. I found that Apache ignores these files. Meanwhile, I found this solution to be the most efficient resource-wise, although time consuming as far as personally.
NOTE: This solution doesn't quite have the effect I had originally intended. For some reason, the per-directory php.ini file is not being loaded per-request to a given virtual host. I'm currently searching for another possibility for solving this issue. In the mean time, I'll leave this up for legacy purposes and to remind myself how quick to conclusion I can be. ;)
Solution #2: The second work-around is to use the PHPRC environment variable configurable in Apache using the SetEnv directive. This directive allows you to set an environment variable that is then passed to any CGI script and/or Server Side Include (SSI) set in any static (x)HTML page (or other document type). In this instance, you'd be telling each PHP-CGI instance where to find its configuration settings. The example would be (coinciding with the previous one):
NOTE: This solution doesn't quite have the effect I had originally intended. For some reason, the per-directory php.ini file is not being loaded per-request to a given virtual host. I'm currently searching for another possibility for solving this issue. In the mean time, I'll leave this up for legacy purposes and to remind myself how quick to conclusion I can be. ;)
Solution #2: The second work-around is to use the PHPRC environment variable configurable in Apache using the SetEnv directive. This directive allows you to set an environment variable that is then passed to any CGI script and/or Server Side Include (SSI) set in any static (x)HTML page (or other document type). In this instance, you'd be telling each PHP-CGI instance where to find its configuration settings. The example would be (coinciding with the previous one):
# vhosts.conf
NameVirtualHost *:81
<VirtualHost *:81>
ServerAdmin admin@example.com
ServerName vhost.example.com
DocumentRoot "C:/path/to/doc/root"
ErrorLog "logs/vhost.example.com-errors.log"
# Set the PHPRC environment variable
SetEnv PHPRC "C:/path/to/doc/root/php.ini"
<Directory "C:/path/to/doc/root">
# ... yadda, yadda, yadda ...
# you get the point!
</Directory>
</VirtualHost>
There are two very good reasons why I don't believe this to be the better solution, although it does work. The first reason is that it requires you to have a php.ini file per directory. As I said before, I don't have much of a problem with this under IIS, but that is simply because in IIS, PHP reads the master php.ini file as well as per-directory configuration files. Apache, however, does not. The issue here is that each and every per-directory configuration file must contain all directives previously set in the master PHP configuration file. In other words, if you have a common include_path directive (for example) set that includes common file locations that you plan to use in conjunction with the current working directory's files accross your virtual hosts, you would have to also implicitly express the already set paths in EVERY php.ini file. Again, this is not the case in IIS. In IIS, you can set all the generalized configuration settings for PHP that remain true accross all of your Web sites and only set the pertinent ones in the per-directory configuration files. In that sense, you could have your include_path directive in your master file set to include common PHP scripts and includes and set your doc_root setting in the per-directory file to include scripts from anywhere in that site's current working directory. Here's an example:
Master php.ini Configuration File:
include_path = ".;C:/PHP/PHP5/pear;C:/Users/Hyponiq/Sites/Framework"
Per-Directory php.ini Configuration File (IIS):
; include_path already implied and settings used under IIS
doc_root = "C:/Users/Hyponiq/Sites/hyponiqs.com"
Per-Directory php.ini Configuration File (Apache):
; include_path is ignored from the master file; in fact, it wasn't even read!
include_path = ".;C:/PHP/PHP5/pear;C:/Users/Hyponiq/Sites/Framework"
doc_root = "C:/Users/Hyponiq/Sites/hyponiqs.com"
Conversely, if you specify an already implicitly set configuration variable in a per-directory file, it is overwritten. This also comes in handy in IIS. Sometimes, you may not need or wish to include a directive set in the master file in all of your virtual hosts, especially one that is more limited than the other. To keep this as short as possible (and it's already lengthy), I'll not go into that. Considering that, however, there are times I could see this solution coming in handy.
The other problem I have with this solution is that in order to use it, you must set the AllowOverride FileInfo directive in the httpd.conf file in order to allow the SetEnv directive to be parsed and utilized in each virtual host. What this means is that Apache then also allows the use of other -- and potentially harmful -- directives as well. What does this mean for server administrators? If you're working in a multi-user environment, such as a Web hosting service, a user may include allowed FileInfo overridden directives that could cause unwanted problems, if used correctly -- or even incorrectly by a novice. To my knowledge (correct me if I'm wrong), there are no Apache configuration directives that allow server administrators to allow or deny specific configuration directives. AllowOverride only limits categories which encompass many directives. Thus, an expert user who knows what they are doing could potentially cause serious damage to a server. In that case, a seriously inexperienced user without any knowledge could accidently mess things up as well.
Well, I hope this helps all of you -- novices and professionals alike.
Master php.ini Configuration File:
include_path = ".;C:/PHP/PHP5/pear;C:/Users/Hyponiq/Sites/Framework"
Per-Directory php.ini Configuration File (IIS):
; include_path already implied and settings used under IIS
doc_root = "C:/Users/Hyponiq/Sites/hyponiqs.com"
Per-Directory php.ini Configuration File (Apache):
; include_path is ignored from the master file; in fact, it wasn't even read!
include_path = ".;C:/PHP/PHP5/pear;C:/Users/Hyponiq/Sites/Framework"
doc_root = "C:/Users/Hyponiq/Sites/hyponiqs.com"
Conversely, if you specify an already implicitly set configuration variable in a per-directory file, it is overwritten. This also comes in handy in IIS. Sometimes, you may not need or wish to include a directive set in the master file in all of your virtual hosts, especially one that is more limited than the other. To keep this as short as possible (and it's already lengthy), I'll not go into that. Considering that, however, there are times I could see this solution coming in handy.
The other problem I have with this solution is that in order to use it, you must set the AllowOverride FileInfo directive in the httpd.conf file in order to allow the SetEnv directive to be parsed and utilized in each virtual host. What this means is that Apache then also allows the use of other -- and potentially harmful -- directives as well. What does this mean for server administrators? If you're working in a multi-user environment, such as a Web hosting service, a user may include allowed FileInfo overridden directives that could cause unwanted problems, if used correctly -- or even incorrectly by a novice. To my knowledge (correct me if I'm wrong), there are no Apache configuration directives that allow server administrators to allow or deny specific configuration directives. AllowOverride only limits categories which encompass many directives. Thus, an expert user who knows what they are doing could potentially cause serious damage to a server. In that case, a seriously inexperienced user without any knowledge could accidently mess things up as well.
Well, I hope this helps all of you -- novices and professionals alike.
Friday, December 28, 2007
I've been suffering a lot mentally and emotionally. So, to try and ease my suffering a little, I took on a graphics project for myself. I came up with something rather spectacular, in my own opinion (most likely not in others opinions) and I hope you like it.
What I came up with is a space-themed abstract work. I called it "Reprieval" because it was an escape from my own present reality. It's a visual trip into the unknown. Infer whatever emotion from it you wish, but to me it represents an emotional explosion.
Well, here's the piece:
I know this isn't very big and, if you wish, you can see the full sized image here: http://beserker1983.deviantart.com/art/Reprieval-72938850
I hope you like it.
What I came up with is a space-themed abstract work. I called it "Reprieval" because it was an escape from my own present reality. It's a visual trip into the unknown. Infer whatever emotion from it you wish, but to me it represents an emotional explosion.
Well, here's the piece:
I know this isn't very big and, if you wish, you can see the full sized image here: http://beserker1983.deviantart.com/art/Reprieval-72938850
I hope you like it.
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Man, things can change
A lot has happened since my most recent post. The woman I had started seeing decided enough was enough a short time ago. I guess it was for the best, anyway. Although I cared greatly for her - and I know she felt the same for me - we had too many different points of view in life. Too, a few things happened that made it harder for us to have a healthy relationship.
We never fussed or argued, save one time, and we enjoyed each time we shared together. There were just outside factors involved and it somehow changed her perspective on the matter.
Whatever, life goes on.
Aside from that, I've found a new profession that I seem to enjoy. Right now, I'm a bar-back at Ray's ESG on Kingston Pike here in Knoxville. It's a nice little place. The job I have is very fast-paced, although it's very free and flexible. I work at my own pace - so long as everything gets done - and have a wonderful time with it. The people I work with are great and treat me with respect. Too, people are constantly bragging about the "good job [I] do." It's nice being appreciated.
I'm making wonderful money; for the first time in my life I go without wanting or needing anything. If I run short on cash, all I need do is wait a day or two until I'm back at work. I make tips daily, so I always have money.
Generally speaking, life has been good to me lately, despite my recent break-up. I can't really complain about things. I'm back on the look-out for a potential lover and hope I'm not single for too long. Aside from that, I'm having the time of my life.
I suppose this will have to do for now. I've got other things I should be doing right now. Have a wonderful day, whomever is reading this right now.
We never fussed or argued, save one time, and we enjoyed each time we shared together. There were just outside factors involved and it somehow changed her perspective on the matter.
Whatever, life goes on.
Aside from that, I've found a new profession that I seem to enjoy. Right now, I'm a bar-back at Ray's ESG on Kingston Pike here in Knoxville. It's a nice little place. The job I have is very fast-paced, although it's very free and flexible. I work at my own pace - so long as everything gets done - and have a wonderful time with it. The people I work with are great and treat me with respect. Too, people are constantly bragging about the "good job [I] do." It's nice being appreciated.
I'm making wonderful money; for the first time in my life I go without wanting or needing anything. If I run short on cash, all I need do is wait a day or two until I'm back at work. I make tips daily, so I always have money.
Generally speaking, life has been good to me lately, despite my recent break-up. I can't really complain about things. I'm back on the look-out for a potential lover and hope I'm not single for too long. Aside from that, I'm having the time of my life.
I suppose this will have to do for now. I've got other things I should be doing right now. Have a wonderful day, whomever is reading this right now.
Thursday, April 12, 2007
I'm slacking!
I really should keep up with this thing, shouldn't I? With all the things I do on a day-in, day-out basis, it's rather difficult for me to keep on posting. Maybe one of these days I'll have my schedule worked out well enough to keep in practice with posting blogs.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Disregard my previous statements of an "old hope"...
Odd things happen to the hopeless, that's for certain. I mentioned an "old hope" or a flame that had been somewhat rekindled. Well, I found something better ... or someone, I should say. She's wonderful and hope everything goes right with her and I.
Well, as simple as this is, ciao. Got better things to do. ;)
Well, as simple as this is, ciao. Got better things to do. ;)
Thursday, February 8, 2007
Some peope are unincorrigable.
This is a conversation I had today with someone rather ... disturbing.
(Bear in mind, she's racist. If you want to see her profile for further investigation, go to http://profiles.yahoo.com/redneck_kkk_cowgirl. Please have an open mind when you read this.)
hyponiq2006: You, like all other racist bastards and bitches, need to be shot or find yourself at the losing end of a rope.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: and who just might you be
hyponiq2006: I am me.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: a nigger lover i assume
hyponiq2006: Not necessarily.
hyponiq2006: I grew up all over the United States. I've had very good friends of all races and creeds. I've also had worst enemies of the same.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: well if u aint white,u aint right
hyponiq2006: It is simply more gratifying to judge one by their intelligence and character, not the pigment of their skin.
hyponiq2006: "Right" is a matter of opinion.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: and the kkk is RIGHT
hyponiq2006: No, it's really not.
hyponiq2006: Murder, false judgment ... these are things capitally punishable per the Bible.
hyponiq2006: You do believe in God, don't you?
hyponiq2006: Well, according to the scriptures, "Judge not lest ye be judged." I'm not a holy roller, but I do believe that the actions we take in this life follow us to the next.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: LOOK FOOL,UR WASTING YOUR TIME. IM RIGHT,YOUR WRONG,SIMPLE AS THAT
hyponiq2006: No, you're delusional.
hyponiq2006: There's a difference.
hyponiq2006: It's called "self-reinforcing delusion."
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: your stupid
hyponiq2006: Correction ... you're the idiot.
hyponiq2006: For starters, at least I know the difference between "your" and "you're".
hyponiq2006: Don't DARE try to pick apart my intelligence; you don't have the time.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: little wigger boy
hyponiq2006: "wigger"? Hardly.
hyponiq2006: If I were "wigger", I'd be talking black.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: cant teat apart something you dont have
hyponiq2006: Considering the fact that you're attacking my person, and I haven't attacked you yet, I'd say that I'm the one with a higher intelligence.
hyponiq2006: That might be a logical assumption.
hyponiq2006: Also considering the fact that I do not judge for I absolutely despise to be judged.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: you have a person?where?
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: lil boy went to get his mommy
hyponiq2006: Correction, I went to get a glass of tea.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: from aunt jemima i bet
hyponiq2006: Uh, no, from my refrigerator.
hyponiq2006: Seriously ... enough of this useless banter ...
hyponiq2006: ... why on Earth did you decide to be racist? What happened to you to make you choose such a path?
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: banter
hyponiq2006: "Banter" is synonymous with "argument".
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: because its the only path to follow
hyponiq2006: That's utter bull shit.
hyponiq2006: Why is it the only path to follow?
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: utters are cow tits....duh
hyponiq2006: "utter" also means "absolute".
hyponiq2006:
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: awwwww
hyponiq2006: Get a dictionary before you choose to correct me.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: your so dumb
hyponiq2006: Nope. I'm perfectly capable of speech.
hyponiq2006: "Dumb" is the inability to make noise.
hyponiq2006: At least, that's the proper definition.
hyponiq2006: Let's try this again ...
redneck_kkk_cowgirl:
hyponiq2006: Why is racism the only path to follow?
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: your a riot
hyponiq2006: you're*
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: no not me, you
hyponiq2006: I was correcting your improper use of "your".
hyponiq2006: Once again, stop attacking me and get to my question.
hyponiq2006: If you cannot answer, you only prove your lack of intelligence.
hyponiq2006: Why is racism the only path to follow?
hyponiq2006: If you cannot answer, not only do you not prove an existence of intelligence, you also prove you don't truly believe your "belief".
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: or im avoiding a very gay person thats boring as hell
hyponiq2006: Yes, I am happy.
hyponiq2006: Boring? Perhaps to someone who cannot fully understand true forms of intelligent conversation.
hyponiq2006:
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: havent heard any yet
hyponiq2006: You haven't been paying attention, then.
hyponiq2006: Then again, you're probably too dense to pay attention. I bet if a bird crossed your path right now, you'd forget you were even in this conversation.
hyponiq2006: Short attention spans are a plague to society.
hyponiq2006: Such as racism.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: if its a blackbird id shoot it
hyponiq2006: You are impossible.
hyponiq2006: You need to see the movie "American History X".
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: movies are fake like u
hyponiq2006: That might change your perspective a little bit. It's about delusional cowards like you.
hyponiq2006: No, this movie is based on fact.
hyponiq2006: And I'm as real as the processor(s) controlling your computer.
hyponiq2006: I don't care if movies are based on fact or fiction. All stories - real or not - have underlying realities.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: hollywood wouldnt know reality any more than u do
hyponiq2006: The one reality you need to face is that beneath our skin, we all bleed red. We all are chemically composited of the same materials.
hyponiq2006: Black, white, tan, pale ... it makes no difference. WE all have the same biological composition.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: i bet youd love to shoot me hun
hyponiq2006: Just because one idiot acts afool doesn't mean every one in that race is an idiot, too.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: does if you a nigger
hyponiq2006: No, I wouldn't. I believe in "Live and let live". Capital punishment is reserved for the most heinous of crimes.
hyponiq2006: Simply hating someone isn't heinous enough.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: let me guess,your a liberal
hyponiq2006: I don't claim to be anything.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: i bet youd love to shoot me hun
hyponiq2006: Except honest and true.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: im glad because u arent anything
hyponiq2006: No, I would not. How many times must I say it?
hyponiq2006: Well, if I'm nothing, neither are you. After all, you are talking to me.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: so your a liar to
hyponiq2006: I am not a liar.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: hyponiq2006: You, like all other racist bastards and bitches, need to be shot or find yourself on the losing end of a rope.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: your a liar
hyponiq2006: lol
hyponiq2006: No, I didn't say "You, like all racist bastards and bitches, need to be shot BY ME or find yourself on the losing end of a rope." I never said I would do it.
hyponiq2006: I just said that someone should.
hyponiq2006: I don't own or opperate a single firearm.
hyponiq2006: That's a cowardous weapon.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: no,your the coward
hyponiq2006: Am I?
hyponiq2006: I'm not afraid to respect or love anyone.
hyponiq2006: You are.
hyponiq2006: That makes you the coward.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: neither am i
hyponiq2006: You run and hide from those you do not know and threaten that they should all be killed or degraded.
hyponiq2006: Have you ever taken the time to truly know those you claim to hate?
hyponiq2006: I doubt it.
hyponiq2006: If you had you would realize they're not all bad.
hyponiq2006: Believe me, I know.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl:
hyponiq2006: You must understand that, genetically speaking, there is no such thing as "truly white".
hyponiq2006: And, for further knowledge, we ALL come from the same place.
hyponiq2006: We all originate from the continent of Africa. The "Adam and Eve" remnants - oldest documented skeletal remains found - were found in the very heart of Africa.
hyponiq2006: Being that a fact, you have the same genetics in your blood as any black man or woman.
hyponiq2006: Don't believe me? Google it. There are all kinds of documents on the matter by leading archaeologists.
hyponiq2006: So, to hate any "nigger" would, in turn, be hating yourself.
hyponiq2006: There is the underlying problem. I truly believe that you don't truly like yourself enough, so, you take it out on an easy target.
hyponiq2006: Hell, there are plenty of racists out there; at least by being racist yourself you have something in common with someone else.
hyponiq2006: A vast amount of people.
hyponiq2006: Sad, it is.
hyponiq2006: Pathetic, too.
hyponiq2006: There are some truly benevolent - and evil, for that matter - people in all races.
hyponiq2006: You really should take a lesson from both sides before you choose to be so ... judgmental.
hyponiq2006: And, for that, I'm done.
(Bear in mind, she's racist. If you want to see her profile for further investigation, go to http://profiles.yahoo.com/redneck_kkk_cowgirl. Please have an open mind when you read this.)
hyponiq2006: You, like all other racist bastards and bitches, need to be shot or find yourself at the losing end of a rope.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: and who just might you be
hyponiq2006: I am me.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: a nigger lover i assume
hyponiq2006: Not necessarily.
hyponiq2006: I grew up all over the United States. I've had very good friends of all races and creeds. I've also had worst enemies of the same.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: well if u aint white,u aint right
hyponiq2006: It is simply more gratifying to judge one by their intelligence and character, not the pigment of their skin.
hyponiq2006: "Right" is a matter of opinion.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: and the kkk is RIGHT
hyponiq2006: No, it's really not.
hyponiq2006: Murder, false judgment ... these are things capitally punishable per the Bible.
hyponiq2006: You do believe in God, don't you?
hyponiq2006: Well, according to the scriptures, "Judge not lest ye be judged." I'm not a holy roller, but I do believe that the actions we take in this life follow us to the next.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: LOOK FOOL,UR WASTING YOUR TIME. IM RIGHT,YOUR WRONG,SIMPLE AS THAT
hyponiq2006: No, you're delusional.
hyponiq2006: There's a difference.
hyponiq2006: It's called "self-reinforcing delusion."
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: your stupid
hyponiq2006: Correction ... you're the idiot.
hyponiq2006: For starters, at least I know the difference between "your" and "you're".
hyponiq2006: Don't DARE try to pick apart my intelligence; you don't have the time.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: little wigger boy
hyponiq2006: "wigger"? Hardly.
hyponiq2006: If I were "wigger", I'd be talking black.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: cant teat apart something you dont have
hyponiq2006: Considering the fact that you're attacking my person, and I haven't attacked you yet, I'd say that I'm the one with a higher intelligence.
hyponiq2006: That might be a logical assumption.
hyponiq2006: Also considering the fact that I do not judge for I absolutely despise to be judged.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: you have a person?where?
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: lil boy went to get his mommy
hyponiq2006: Correction, I went to get a glass of tea.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: from aunt jemima i bet
hyponiq2006: Uh, no, from my refrigerator.
hyponiq2006: Seriously ... enough of this useless banter ...
hyponiq2006: ... why on Earth did you decide to be racist? What happened to you to make you choose such a path?
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: banter
hyponiq2006: "Banter" is synonymous with "argument".
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: because its the only path to follow
hyponiq2006: That's utter bull shit.
hyponiq2006: Why is it the only path to follow?
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: utters are cow tits....duh
hyponiq2006: "utter" also means "absolute".
hyponiq2006:
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: awwwww
hyponiq2006: Get a dictionary before you choose to correct me.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: your so dumb
hyponiq2006: Nope. I'm perfectly capable of speech.
hyponiq2006: "Dumb" is the inability to make noise.
hyponiq2006: At least, that's the proper definition.
hyponiq2006: Let's try this again ...
redneck_kkk_cowgirl:
hyponiq2006: Why is racism the only path to follow?
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: your a riot
hyponiq2006: you're*
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: no not me, you
hyponiq2006: I was correcting your improper use of "your".
hyponiq2006: Once again, stop attacking me and get to my question.
hyponiq2006: If you cannot answer, you only prove your lack of intelligence.
hyponiq2006: Why is racism the only path to follow?
hyponiq2006: If you cannot answer, not only do you not prove an existence of intelligence, you also prove you don't truly believe your "belief".
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: or im avoiding a very gay person thats boring as hell
hyponiq2006: Yes, I am happy.
hyponiq2006: Boring? Perhaps to someone who cannot fully understand true forms of intelligent conversation.
hyponiq2006:
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: havent heard any yet
hyponiq2006: You haven't been paying attention, then.
hyponiq2006: Then again, you're probably too dense to pay attention. I bet if a bird crossed your path right now, you'd forget you were even in this conversation.
hyponiq2006: Short attention spans are a plague to society.
hyponiq2006: Such as racism.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: if its a blackbird id shoot it
hyponiq2006: You are impossible.
hyponiq2006: You need to see the movie "American History X".
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: movies are fake like u
hyponiq2006: That might change your perspective a little bit. It's about delusional cowards like you.
hyponiq2006: No, this movie is based on fact.
hyponiq2006: And I'm as real as the processor(s) controlling your computer.
hyponiq2006: I don't care if movies are based on fact or fiction. All stories - real or not - have underlying realities.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: hollywood wouldnt know reality any more than u do
hyponiq2006: The one reality you need to face is that beneath our skin, we all bleed red. We all are chemically composited of the same materials.
hyponiq2006: Black, white, tan, pale ... it makes no difference. WE all have the same biological composition.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: i bet youd love to shoot me hun
hyponiq2006: Just because one idiot acts afool doesn't mean every one in that race is an idiot, too.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: does if you a nigger
hyponiq2006: No, I wouldn't. I believe in "Live and let live". Capital punishment is reserved for the most heinous of crimes.
hyponiq2006: Simply hating someone isn't heinous enough.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: let me guess,your a liberal
hyponiq2006: I don't claim to be anything.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: i bet youd love to shoot me hun
hyponiq2006: Except honest and true.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: im glad because u arent anything
hyponiq2006: No, I would not. How many times must I say it?
hyponiq2006: Well, if I'm nothing, neither are you. After all, you are talking to me.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: so your a liar to
hyponiq2006: I am not a liar.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: hyponiq2006: You, like all other racist bastards and bitches, need to be shot or find yourself on the losing end of a rope.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: your a liar
hyponiq2006: lol
hyponiq2006: No, I didn't say "You, like all racist bastards and bitches, need to be shot BY ME or find yourself on the losing end of a rope." I never said I would do it.
hyponiq2006: I just said that someone should.
hyponiq2006: I don't own or opperate a single firearm.
hyponiq2006: That's a cowardous weapon.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: no,your the coward
hyponiq2006: Am I?
hyponiq2006: I'm not afraid to respect or love anyone.
hyponiq2006: You are.
hyponiq2006: That makes you the coward.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl: neither am i
hyponiq2006: You run and hide from those you do not know and threaten that they should all be killed or degraded.
hyponiq2006: Have you ever taken the time to truly know those you claim to hate?
hyponiq2006: I doubt it.
hyponiq2006: If you had you would realize they're not all bad.
hyponiq2006: Believe me, I know.
redneck_kkk_cowgirl:
hyponiq2006: You must understand that, genetically speaking, there is no such thing as "truly white".
hyponiq2006: And, for further knowledge, we ALL come from the same place.
hyponiq2006: We all originate from the continent of Africa. The "Adam and Eve" remnants - oldest documented skeletal remains found - were found in the very heart of Africa.
hyponiq2006: Being that a fact, you have the same genetics in your blood as any black man or woman.
hyponiq2006: Don't believe me? Google it. There are all kinds of documents on the matter by leading archaeologists.
hyponiq2006: So, to hate any "nigger" would, in turn, be hating yourself.
hyponiq2006: There is the underlying problem. I truly believe that you don't truly like yourself enough, so, you take it out on an easy target.
hyponiq2006: Hell, there are plenty of racists out there; at least by being racist yourself you have something in common with someone else.
hyponiq2006: A vast amount of people.
hyponiq2006: Sad, it is.
hyponiq2006: Pathetic, too.
hyponiq2006: There are some truly benevolent - and evil, for that matter - people in all races.
hyponiq2006: You really should take a lesson from both sides before you choose to be so ... judgmental.
hyponiq2006: And, for that, I'm done.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
